Finance

The period closes without costing you a week.

A running bridge from work won, to money invoiced, to money collected, to margin, built from the same records that ran the work rather than from a spreadsheet one person maintains and everybody quietly distrusts. Your accounting system stays exactly where it is. Here is what the sheet looks like.

PERIOD BRIDGE, MONTH TO DATE

Assembled continuously

Signed value in period412,600was 377,100+9.4%
Recurring268,900was 251,400+7.0%
One time143,700was 125,700+14.3%
Invoiced389,400was 361,800+7.6%
Not yet invoiced23,200was 15,300+51.6%
Received in period341,800was 330,200+3.5%
Outstanding47,600was 31,600+50.6%
Direct cost of delivery186,300was 166,900+11.6%
Gross profit226,300was 210,200+7.7%
Gross margin54.8%was 55.7%-0.9 pt

CASH, NOT REVENUE

Revenue is an opinion. Cash is the fact.

A business rarely fails because the revenue number was wrong. It fails because the money arrived later than the money went out. Receivables are the lever most companies have and least manage, because the position is only ever as current as the last export somebody remembered to run.

Current, 0 to 30 days$28,900
31 to 60 days$11,400
61 to 90 days$5,100
Over 90 days$2,200

The forecast weights each expected receipt by how that customer has actually paid over the trailing year rather than by the terms printed on the agreement. A customer who always takes an extra three weeks is modelled as a customer who always takes an extra three weeks.

See how the chasing actually runs

THE EXPLANATION, WRITTEN ON THE DAY

The number moved. Here is why, with the workings.

Half of a normal close is not accounting, it is reconstruction: finding out what was agreed, what was delivered, and why the number changed. That is why the close takes a week and why the explanation always arrives after the decision it should have informed.

Variance note, signed valueDrafted by the close agent, released by a named owner

Signed value rose 9.4 percent on the prior period, to $412,600. Volume did most of the work: eleven more agreements closed than last period, worth $41,200, and nine of the eleven came through the partner side of the book.

Price added a further $8,700, almost all of it from the two renewals that moved onto current rates in the first week. Mix took $14,400 back out, because the growth was concentrated in the lower margin service line while the higher margin recurring line grew more slowly. That is also the reason gross margin gave up nine tenths of a point while gross profit still rose.

The one item worth a decision is outstanding, up by half to $47,600. It is not a collections failure. Three agreements signed late in the period on longer terms, which is a pricing conversation rather than a chasing one.

Prior period377,100
Volume+41,200
Price+8,700
Mix-14,400
This period412,600

Illustrative. Volume plus price plus mix reconciles to the movement, and the movement reconciles to the bridge above.

WHAT FINANCE COVERS

From agreement to margin, on one continuous record.

Recurring and one time revenue together

Subscriptions, retainers and one off work in one view, so what is dependable and what is not has an answer rather than an estimate.

Invoices raised from signed agreements

The agreement carries the terms and the invoice is produced from them. Nobody re-enters an amount into a second system, which is where two numbers start drifting.

Receipts matched on arrival

Payments reconcile against open invoices as they land, with exceptions surfaced rather than buried, so the aged list is current instead of monthly.

Cost and margin by customer and job

What the work consumed against what it earned, by customer, by product line and by team, calculated from the records that ran the work.

Commissions calculated on the event

When payment clears, not when somebody rebuilds the spreadsheet. Terms live on the relationship, workings are shown, nothing pays without approval.

Revenue and margin by channel

Spend and billing tracked per channel, so which channel is actually carrying an account stops being an opinion held by whoever built the last report.

Wholesale and retail pricing per product

Set what you pay and what you charge for each product, per customer or per partner where terms differ. The spread calculates itself on every transaction.

Referral network on the same ledger

Who introduced the customer, what they are owed, and what is left after they are paid, so attribution and margin resolve together rather than in two arguments.

Period comparisons with the reason attached

The movement and the explanation in one place: the number that changed, the records behind it, and a note you can put in front of a board.

WHAT WE ARE AND ARE NOT CLAIMING

Four things worth being precise about.

Finance buyers get oversold more than anyone, so here is the boundary drawn clearly rather than left comfortable and vague.

01It does not replace your accounting system

It should not, and you should be suspicious of anyone claiming otherwise. Your ledger, your chart of accounts and your statutory reporting stay where they are. Kastor connects to them.

02It removes the retyping between them

The agreement produces the invoice. The receipt matches itself. The exception is raised rather than discovered. That is the whole claim, and it is the one that shortens your close.

03It adds the context accounting cannot see

What the job cost, who delivered it, which partner is owed on it, and whether the customer is at renewal. Your ledger does not hold those. This does, on the same record.

04You keep the controls

Agents propose, people approve. Nothing pays, posts or goes to a customer past a threshold you set without a named person releasing it, and every action is written to the trail.

FOR FINANCE LEADERS

Bring last period to the call.

The bridge you built, the variance you had to explain, and how long the explanation took to assemble. We will walk it through the same sequence and show you which parts stop being work.

Skip to content
Finance

The period closes without costing you a week.

A running bridge from work won, to money invoiced, to money collected, to margin, built from the same records that ran the work rather than from a spreadsheet one person maintains and everybody quietly distrusts. Your accounting system stays exactly where it is. Here is what the sheet looks like.

Period bridge, month to dateAssembled continuously
LineThis periodPrior periodChange
Signed value in period$412,600$377,100+9.4%
Recurring$268,900$251,400+7.0%
One time$143,700$125,700+14.3%
Invoiced$389,400$361,800+7.6%
Not yet invoiced$23,200$15,300+51.6%
Received in period$341,800$330,200+3.5%
OutstandingFlagged$47,600$31,600+50.6%
Direct cost of delivery$186,300$166,900+11.6%
Gross profit$226,300$210,200+7.7%
Gross marginFlagged54.8%55.7%-0.9 pt

Two lines are flagged because they moved against the rest. Outstanding is up by half while receipts are up by three and a half percent, and margin gave up nine tenths of a point. Both were raised on the day they happened, not on the ninth of next month.

Illustrative figures from a demonstration workspace, not a customer result. They are internally consistent: recurring plus one time equals signed value, invoiced plus not yet invoiced equals signed value, received plus outstanding equals invoiced, and signed value less direct cost equals gross profit.

Cash, not revenue

Revenue is an opinion. Cash is the fact.

A business rarely fails because the revenue number was wrong. It fails because the money arrived later than the money went out. Receivables are the lever most companies have and least manage, because the position is only ever as current as the last export somebody remembered to run.

Receivables ageing$47,600

Rebuilt as receipts land, so the buckets mean something on a Tuesday afternoon rather than on the ninth of next month.

  • Current, 0 to 30 days$28,900
  • 31 to 60 days$11,400
  • 61 to 90 days$5,100
  • Over 90 days$2,200

Everything over sixty days is two accounts. Both were flagged in the week they slipped, both are on a follow up sequence, and one has a named owner because it crossed the threshold set for that customer. The list stays short because it never gets a month to grow.

Eight week receipts forecast

What the agreements say will arrive, against what this customer base has historically actually paid.

0k40k80k120kW1W2W3W4W5W6W7W8
Weighted by how they actually payWhat the terms say

The gap in weeks one and two is the whole point. Planning against the terms puts $170k in the first fortnight. Planning against behaviour puts $133k there. One of those numbers is the reason payroll feels tight.

The forecast weights each expected receipt by how that customer has actually paid over the trailing year rather than by the terms printed on the agreement. A customer who always takes an extra three weeks is modelled as a customer who always takes an extra three weeks.

The explanation, written on the day

The number moved. Here is why, with the workings.

Half of a normal close is not accounting, it is reconstruction: finding out what was agreed, what was delivered, and why the number changed. That is why the close takes a week and why the explanation always arrives after the decision it should have informed.

Variance note, signed valueDrafted by the close agent, released by a named owner

Signed value rose 9.4 percent on the prior period, to $412,600. Volume did most of the work: eleven more agreements closed than last period, worth $41,200, and nine of the eleven came through the partner side of the book.

Price added a further $8,700, almost all of it from the two renewals that moved onto current rates in the first week. Mix took $14,400 back out, because the growth was concentrated in the lower margin service line while the higher margin recurring line grew more slowly. That is also the reason gross margin gave up nine tenths of a point while gross profit still rose.

The one item worth a decision is outstanding, up by half to $47,600. It is not a collections failure. Three agreements signed late in the period on longer terms, which is a pricing conversation rather than a chasing one.

How the movement decomposes
Prior period377,100
Volume+41,200
Price+8,700
Mix-14,400
This period412,600

Illustrative. Volume plus price plus mix reconciles to the movement, and the movement reconciles to the bridge above.

What finance covers

From agreement to margin, on one continuous record.

Recurring and one time revenue togetherSubscriptions, retainers and one off work in one view, so what is dependable and what is not has an answer rather than an estimate.
Invoices raised from signed agreementsThe agreement carries the terms and the invoice is produced from them. Nobody re-enters an amount into a second system, which is where two numbers start drifting.
Receipts matched on arrivalPayments reconcile against open invoices as they land, with exceptions surfaced rather than buried, so the aged list is current instead of monthly.
Cost and margin by customer and jobWhat the work consumed against what it earned, by customer, by product line and by team, calculated from the records that ran the work.
Commissions calculated on the eventWhen payment clears, not when somebody rebuilds the spreadsheet. Terms live on the relationship, workings are shown, nothing pays without approval.
Revenue and margin by channelSpend and billing tracked per channel, so which channel is actually carrying an account stops being an opinion held by whoever built the last report.
Wholesale and retail pricing per productSet what you pay and what you charge for each product, per customer or per partner where terms differ. The spread calculates itself on every transaction.
Referral network on the same ledgerWho introduced the customer, what they are owed, and what is left after they are paid, so attribution and margin resolve together rather than in two arguments.
Period comparisons with the reason attachedThe movement and the explanation in one place: the number that changed, the records behind it, and a note you can put in front of a board.
What we are and are not claiming

Four things worth being precise about.

Finance buyers get oversold more than anyone, so here is the boundary drawn clearly rather than left comfortable and vague.

01It does not replace your accounting systemIt should not, and you should be suspicious of anyone claiming otherwise. Your ledger, your chart of accounts and your statutory reporting stay where they are. Kastor connects to them.
02It removes the retyping between themThe agreement produces the invoice. The receipt matches itself. The exception is raised rather than discovered. That is the whole claim, and it is the one that shortens your close.
03It adds the context accounting cannot seeWhat the job cost, who delivered it, which partner is owed on it, and whether the customer is at renewal. Your ledger does not hold those. This does, on the same record.
04You keep the controlsAgents propose, people approve. Nothing pays, posts or goes to a customer past a threshold you set without a named person releasing it, and every action is written to the trail.
For finance leaders

Bring last period to the call.

The bridge you built, the variance you had to explain, and how long the explanation took to assemble. We will walk it through the same sequence and show you which parts stop being work.

KastorBook a demo

See your own week run on one record.

Bring one department and a real week of work. In about thirty minutes we put it through Kastor: an enquiry arriving, moving through your stages, becoming a signed agreement, becoming an invoice, and landing in margin. The same record the whole way, with agents doing the parts nobody should be doing by hand.

  • Your enquiry to cash loop on one record, with the handovers taken out
  • Agents that write the invoice and chase it, not agents that answer questions
  • What your receivables number is today, and what it looks like after
  • Your model running inside your own environment, with the data staying there
No trial signup and no card details One follow up, then we stop Your data stays in your environment We bring the questions, you bring one real week

Request your demo

Five fields and a consent box. We reply within one business day.

How did you hear about Kastor?

We use this to prepare the call and to reply. We do not sell it on or add you to a list you did not ask for.

What happens next

Three steps, and no sales process hiding behind them.

A demo request usually buys you a discovery call, then a qualification call, then a demo. This is one call, and the useful part of it happens in the first ten minutes.

01

A reply within one business day

Two or three times to choose from, and one question back so the call starts in the right place rather than starting at the beginning.

02

Thirty minutes on your own numbers

Not a slide deck. One department, one real week of work, and the loop running against it while you watch. Bring whoever argues with the numbers.

03

You keep the map either way

A written view of every point where your current setup asks a person to carry something between two systems. That is yours whether you go further or not.

Not ready to book anything?

Fair enough. Read the lead to cash page instead. It makes the whole case in about six minutes and asks nothing of you. When it stops being theoretical, the form is still here.

Read that first